We analyzed 16 sediment samples from Ocean Drilling Project (ODP) Site 1258 located on the western slope of Demerara Rise, offshore Suriname (9°26′ N, 54°43.9′ W; at a water depth 3192 m below sea level (m b.s.l.); Erbacher et al., 2004; Müller et al., 2018, 2019). During the early Eocene (Fig. 1), the site location was closer to the Equator (paleocoordinates: 5°14′ N, 47° W; Müller et al., 2019), and sediments accumulated at a paleowater depth of ∼ 2500 m b.s.l. Samples were selected from between 68–100 revised meters composite depth (rmcd) in Holes 1258A and 1258B, within a ∼ 200 m thick unit of carbonate-rich (∼ 60 wt %) nannofossil chalk with foraminifers (Westerhold and Röhl, 2009), corresponding to the EECO. Calcareous nannofossils were abundant and well to moderately well preserved across the studied interval (Erbacher et al., 2004). Based on nannofossil census counts, including taxon-specific preservation indices (Asanbe and Henderiks, 2025), preservation is relatively consistent across the studied interval. Sample age estimates are based on an astronomically tuned age–depth model (Westerhold et al., 2017).

Light microscopy slides were prepared following the “drop technique” (Bordiga et al., 2015) to guarantee an even distribution of coccoliths. LM images were captured using a polarizing microscope (Leica DM6000B, using an HCX PL APO 100x/1.47 objective and a pair of polarizer/analyzer or circular polarizer filters) equipped with a Hamamatsu ORCA-Flash 4.0 black and white digital camera (C11440; pixel resolution 0.064 µm). The images of Toweius specimens were taken both under cross-polarized (XPL) and circular-polarized (CPL) light for clear delineation of the outer- and inner-shield cycles. The combination of two circular polarizers (one left oriented and the other right oriented) and a green monochromatic light filter (λ=561 nm; ZET561/10x, Chroma Technology) allows for the accurate measurement of calcite birefringence and coccolith thickness (Beaufort et al., 2021; see below). Regarding Toweius structural architecture, the R units form the bright middle and inner tubes as well as the lower part of the proximal shield, while the outermost tube, distal shield, and upper part of the proximal shield are primarily made up of V units (Fig. 2; Young et al., 2003). These architectural elements impart distinctive optical properties to Toweius coccoliths under XPL, where dark outer and bright inner cycles are visible. Such unique birefringence patterns facilitate species/morphotype taxonomic determination based on coccolith morphology.

For scanning electron microscopy (SEM), a small amount of sample was suspended in a 0.2 M ammonia solution (pH ≈ 11.3; cf. Bordiga et al., 2015) and was dropped onto a cover glass, mounted on a stub with carbon tape, and dried before sputtering with gold-platinum alloy prior to analysis. SEM imaging of nannofossil specimens was conducted at the Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, using a high-vacuum Zeiss Supra 35VP field emission SEM equipped with a VPSE low-vacuum detector. Images were captured using a 20 kV accelerating voltage, a 30.0 µm aperture, and an average working distance of ∼ 6 mm.

All biometric measurements were conducted on CPL images using a manual setup within the SYRACO software (Beaufort et al., 2014; with CPL upgrades as described in Beaufort et al., 2021). Specimens were selected from live images by drawing a region of interest (ROI). The combination of left-oriented and right-oriented CPL settings results in a composite, 8-bit gray-scale image (CP-CPI) that is segmented (by manually setting a gray level (GL) threshold), analyzed, and saved. The measured parameters include the entire coccolith and central opening dimensions, such as length and width. The SYRACO software automatically measures coccolith area (µm2), mean thickness (µm; as derived from mean GL), and calcite mass, following the principle of linear correlation of calcite birefringence (brightness) to coccolith thickness (Beaufort, 2005; Beaufort et al., 2014, 2021). Theoretically, using monochromatic green light (λ=561 nm), thickness can be determined for specimens between 0 and 1.63 µm thick (Beaufort et al., 2021; Sect. S1 in the Supplement). The latter relationship is only true for R units that have their crystallographic orientation parallel to the glass slide, whereas equally thick V units appear only slightly birefringent under CPL and thus result in a systematic underestimation of calcite mass (Fig. 2; Cubillos et al., 2012; Šupraha and Henderiks, 2020). Yet, mean GL-derived thickness and mass indices still serve as accurate, relative comparisons between morphotypes (intra-specific variability).

V units also make detecting the distal shield edges of Toweius placoliths somewhat challenging, since their GLs are close to background GL (“black”) under CPL. To optimize segmentation, the lower threshold was set to GL = 22 for small specimens (type II) and GL = 27 for larger specimens (type I). The threshold was further refined to clearly delineate the coccolith outer margin and central area from the background, particularly in clouded samples. For mean thickness and mass index considerations, this implies a slight underestimation for the larger specimens (since the threshold value is subtracted before mean GL is calculated for the segmented specimen), but we consider this bias negligible in the context of the effect of generally larger sizes and the presence of additional R-unit cycles in type I (Fig. 2). Additional shape parameters, independent of size, were calculated. The ratio of the central area to rim width (CA / rim) assesses the relative proportion of central area length to the rim width. Coccolith circularity was calculated following (e.g., Henderiks, 2008) 1Circularity index=WL, where L is coccolith length (maximum diameter), and W is coccolith width (minimum diameter). A high circularity index refers to a more circular shape, while lower circularity indicates a more elliptical coccolith shape. The frequency distribution and cross plots of the different measured and calculated parameters were compared to obtain first-hand morphometric criteria that distinguish the main Toweius morphotypes. For each morphotype, if present, a minimum of 50 specimens were measured per sample. In total, 1452 specimens were measured, including 610 Toweius type I and 842 Toweius type II. Three additional samples were selected from the depth interval below the EECO to investigate the stratigraphic range of Toweius type II and any possible “transitional” forms (no biometry performed).

A subset of original images measured using the aforementioned methodology were re-evaluated with a fixed threshold (GL = 25) applied to both Toweius type I and Toweius type II. In total, 599 images (334 Toweius type I and 266 Toweius type II) from 11 samples in which both morphotypes co-occur were re-analyzed as a batch using a custom-made macro in Fiji software (ImageJ v2.16.0). The software determined GL ranging from 0 (black) to 255 (white) and performed size measurements (area, perimeter, length, and width of the fitted ellipse) on coccolith objects. Although central area dimensions were not determined with this approach, re-evaluation was necessary to validate relative differences in coccolith size, mean thickness, and mass index using a consistent thresholding approach (see Sects. S1–S2 and Figs. S1–S4 in the Supplement). Coccolith thickness and mass were estimated following the protocol described in Beaufort et al. (2021): 2d=MGL⋅1.63256(µm)3ρmass=d⋅A⋅pg, where d is the mean thickness, MGL is the mean gray level, A is the area of the coccolith in µm², and ρ is the density of calcite (2.71 pg µm⁻³).

The XPL, CPL, and SEM images of Toweius types I and II are presented in Plates 1 and 2. These images provide a detailed visual comparison of the morphological and crystallographic characteristics distinguishing the two groups. All coccoliths belonging to Toweius type I display a highly birefringent inner-shield cycle (tube cycle) and a low-birefringent (dark gray) outer-shield cycle under LM (Plate 1, figs. 1–2). SEM observations show that the coccolith architecture features three distinct concentric tube layers (Plate 1, figs. 3–8). Specifically, the distal side of the coccolith is characterized by the extension of the inner- and middle-tube cycles (R unit), while the proximal shield surface is covered by a layer of coccolith elements (R unit) (Plate 1, figs. 3–8). Toweius type II coccoliths show subcircular to circular outlines and wide-open central areas. Under LM, these specimens exhibit faint birefringence and a predominantly dark appearance (Plate 2, figs. 1–6). A distinguishing feature of this morphotype is the presence of two prominent lens-shaped extinction features along the rim, which appear curly when the focus is adjusted (Plate 2, figs. 1–6). These curved extinction points are partially occluded by the bright inner-tube cycle elements in Toweius type I (Plate 1, figs. 1–2). SEM observations of Toweius type II reveal coccoliths that have intact proximal and distal shields but are composed of a single tube cycle element, notably lacking the R-unit element from both the distal and the proximal views (Plate 2, figs. 7–14). Nonetheless, the crystallographic characteristics of Toweius type II distal shields closely resemble those of Toweius type I. Specifically, the distal shield elements exhibit a sinistral obliquity, and the crystal edges between the rhombohedral faces in both Toweius type I and Toweius type II follow similar orientation of the crystallographic a and c axes (compare Plate 1, figs. 3–8, and Plate 2, figs. 7–14).

The comparison between the primary dataset and validation dataset is presented and described in the Supplement (see Sect. S2 and Figs. S3–S4 in the Supplement). It is important to note that the entirety of the biometry and statistical analyses presented and described in the main text is based on the full primary dataset. The morphometric analysis reveals a bimodal distribution in coccolith size (length) for the entire dataset encompassing Toweius types I and II (N=1452), with overall coccolith size (length) ranging from 2.08 to 7.23 µm (Fig. 3a). Coccoliths belonging to Toweius type I exhibit a wider size variation, ranging from 2.22 to 7.23 µm (mean = 4.14 µm), than Toweius type II, which spans 2.08 to 4.41 µm (mean = 2.73 µm) (Fig. 3a). The smaller-sized Toweius type I coccoliths (< 4 µm) and Toweius type II substantially overlap, ranging from 2.21–4.41 µm. The majority of Toweius type II has size ranges centered between 2 and 3 µm. The circularity index shows that all measured coccoliths range from elliptical (0.80) to perfectly circular (1) (Fig. 3b). Although there is a substantial overlap in the degree of circularity between the two morphotypes, Toweius type II is generally more circular (mean = 0.95) compared to Toweius type I (mean = 0.91) (Fig. 3a).

The density distribution and cross plot of the width, CA / rim ratio, mean thickness, and mass index against length reveal two distributions within the dataset. Compared to coccolith length and circularity distribution, these parameters distinctly delineate between Toweius types I and II, with very little overlap (Fig. 3c–f). Specifically, the CA / rim ratio of Toweius type I ranges from 0.05 to 2.81 (mean = 0.63), with the majority of the observations falling well below 1 (Fig. 3d). In contrast, Toweius type II displays a high degree of variability in CA / rim ratio values, ranging between ∼ 0.05 and 6.66 (mean = 2.63). The CA / rim ratio in this morphotype is inversely correlated with coccolith length, whereas the CA / rim ratio of Toweius type I is relatively stable across specimens of different sizes (Fig. 3d). Furthermore, coccolith mean thickness and mass index derived from coccolith birefringence (GL) show a strong positive correlation with overall coccolith size (length), with correlation coefficients of r=0.85 and r=0.84, respectively (Fig. 3e–f). The mean coccolith thickness and mass index of Toweius type I reach maximum estimates of 0.77 µm (mean = 0.38 µm) and 71.67 pg (mean = 10.81 pg). In contrast, Toweius type II coccoliths are relatively much thinner and lightly calcified, with mean thickness and mass index ranging from 0.14 to 0.37 µm (mean = 0.22 µm) and 0.70 to 10.72 pg (mean = 2.11 pg), respectively (Fig. 3e–f).

Box-and-whisker plots illustrate the median, interquartile range, overall spread, and symmetry of the morphometric dataset (Fig. 4). The results reveal a clear distinction between the two Toweius morphotypes across all major morphometric parameters, particularly within the interquartile range (25th–75th percentile) (Fig. 4). A Shapiro–Wilk normality test indicates that the morphometric parameters do not follow a normal distribution. Since the distribution might only be slightly skewed, we applied both parametric and non-parametric statistical methods to rigorously assess differences between Toweius morphotypes. The two-sample t test and Mann–Whitney test confirm that Toweius type I differs significantly from Toweius type II in length, circularity, CA / rim ratio, and thickness (Table 1).

Previous studies (e.g., Bown, 2010; Self-Trail et al., 2012) have highlighted that the size and central area structural variability in Toweius likely reflect a greater number of biological species than are currently recognized by morphological criteria. Such subtle differences parallel the diversity observed in modern Reticulofenestra lineages, including Emiliania huxleyi and Gephyrocapsa. Therefore, the wide variation in shape and size among coccoliths classified as Toweius type I reflects the pooling of multiple formally defined Toweius species into a single morphotype (Fig. 3a). The key unifying feature in this morphotype is the presence of a birefringent (R-unit) inner-tube cycle and a darker (V-unit) outer tube, genus-level diagnostic criteria that distinguish Toweius type I from Toweius type II (Fig. 3a). Toweius type II lacks the inner-tube cycle (R unit) associated with Toweius and can be further differentiated by its small (∼ 3 µm) and (sub)circular to circular coccoliths with a wide central opening (CA / rim ratio >1) (Fig. 3a, b).

Although previous studies (Bown and Pearson, 2009; Gibbs et al., 2018) have reported small, fragile Toweius species comparable to Toweius type II in terms of size, it is important to note that these morphotypes still retain the complete Toweius coccolith architecture, making them distinct from Toweius type II. Bralower and Mutterlose (1995) documented the occurrence of Toweius specimens at ODP Site 865 in the tropical Pacific, which were, at the time, interpreted as severely etched Toweius shields. Detailed re-analyses of Site 865 samples (Asanbe and Henderiks, 2025) revealed consistencies between the Toweius type II specimens described in this study and those previously observed in the equatorial Pacific (Bralower and Mutterlose, 1995). Notably, Toweius type II is more abundant at Site 1258, where carbonate preservation is better than at Site 865, where there is indeed evidence of more severe dissolution (Asanbe and Henderiks, 2025). The temporal consistency in the abundance of this morphotype at both tropical sites, along with its distinct morphometric characteristics revealed in this study, supports the interpretation that Toweius type II represents a truly distinct species (or group of species) (Fig. 5b).

Despite the absence of an R unit, other structural similarities, such as the sinistral obliquity of the distal shield elements, the curly extinction pattern on the outer-tube cycle (compare Plate 1, figs. 1–2, with Plate 2, figs. 1–6), and the orientation of the V units (compare Plate 1, figs. 3–8, with Plate 2, figs. 7–14), provide strong support for the taxonomic (and phylogenetic) placement of Toweius type II within the Toweius genus. The (sub)circular coccolith shape of Toweius type II suggests that it may be related to Toweius species with similar morphology. Among all known Toweius species, Toweius rotundus exhibits the greatest resemblance to Toweius type II in terms of size and shape. While T. rotundus was initially reported to have gone extinct during the PETM at Tanzania Drilling Project (TDP) sites (Bown and Pearson, 2009), later studies identified its presence above its previously assumed extinction level (Schneider et al., 2011; Shamrock and Watkins, 2012).

The overlapping stratigraphic ranges of Toweius type II and T. rotundus suggest a possible phylogenetic relationship. It is plausible that T. rotundus underwent substantial morphological modifications in tropical environments, including a reduction in or complete loss of the R unit. The precise mechanisms underlying these morphological differences remain unclear. Therefore, we need to assess whether Toweius type II resulted from selective dissolution, represents a case of malformation, or constitutes a true evolutionary lineage derived from T. rotundus. Below, we explore these possibilities by examining the potential roles of preservation conditions, ecological factors, and phyletic speciation in the emergence of Toweius type II prior to the EECO.

Episodes of extreme global warming, such as the EECO, are typically associated with major shifts in carbonate preservation due to the complex interplay between elevated atmospheric CO₂ levels, ocean acidification, lysocline dynamics, and CCD shoaling (e.g., Agnini et al., 2007; Dunkley Jones et al., 2008; Pearson et al., 2008; Raffi and De Bernardi, 2008). Carbonate dissolution can significantly alter the taxonomic composition of calcareous nannofossil assemblages by selectively removing fragile structures, often resulting in the complete loss of small and delicate taxa while rendering larger ones unidentifiable (Roth and Thierstein, 1972; Roth, 1978; Bown et al., 2008). The impact of a preservation bias in our study can be considered from two perspectives: (1) as a potential source of bias in morphometric data due to etching and overgrowth and (2) as a possible mechanism underlying morphological differences between the two Toweius morphotypes.

Previous studies at Site 1258 indicate that carbonate preservation remained relatively stable throughout the EECO (Fig. 5a; Asanbe and Henderiks, 2025). SEM evidence reveals a moderate and uniform degree of etching in delicate central area structures and minimal overgrowth in most Toweius specimens. Central area etching, in particular, complicates detailed species-level assessment of Toweius type I but is primarily restricted to fragile structures that are rarely preserved. Assessing the role of dissolution in the emergence of Toweius type II is more challenging, as the absence of both the central area and the inner tube would require a more severe and selective form of etching. If the R units of Toweius coccolith architecture were more susceptible to dissolution than the V units, we would expect to observe varying degrees of selective inner-tube removal in Toweius type I.

Compared to Site 865, where Toweius specimens exhibit signs of intense etching and breakage (Bralower and Mutterlose, 1995), LM and morphometric analyses at Site 1258 do not show evidence of selective alteration of Toweius type I inner tubes or central opening diameters (Plate 1). For selective dissolution to account for the absence of the inner tube in Toweius type II, its precursor species would need to have possessed an inner tube as fragile and thin as the central area structures. This would imply that the dominant Toweius morphotype during peak EECO (52–50 Ma) evolved independently from pre-existing Toweius lineages that likely possessed thinner and more fragile inner tubes (Fig. 2a). The presence of rare transitional forms with thinner inner tubes in samples before the EECO supports the notion that Toweius type II may have emerged from species with inherently delicate inner tubes through mechanisms other than dissolution (Fig. 6).

Although dissolution may have obscured delicate structures in Toweius specimens, and possibly the fragile inner cycle of transitional Toweius type II forms, we argue that the evolutionary development of this more fragile inner cycle itself represents compelling evidence for phyletic speciation – a phenomenon that cannot be attributed solely to dissolution effects. Following this reasoning, we propose that the evolutionary pathway of Toweius type II involved either a gradual modification of intermediate forms with delicate inner cycles or a direct derivation from (sub)circular Toweius ancestors prior to the EECO (Fig. 6).

Morphologically, the lightly calcified nature of Toweius type II could be directly related to structural abnormalities (malformation) during coccolithogenesis in response to environmental stress. Numerous experimental studies (e.g., Langer et al., 2011; Gerecht et al., 2014; Faucher et al., 2020) have shown that coccolithophores can produce abnormal coccolith morphologies as a physiological response to adverse physio-chemical conditions outside their optimal growth ranges. Various cases of coccolith (and foraminifer) malformation have been reported in the fossil record in response to warming and carbonate undersaturation, particularly across the PETM, where extreme temperatures and elevated CO₂ levels exceeded that of the EECO. The PETM is notably marked by the widespread occurrence of transient excursion taxa (Kelly et al., 1996; Bralower, 2002; Kahn and Aubry, 2004; Raffi et al., 2005; Agnini et al., 2006, 2007), which typically disappear once environmental conditions stabilize. Despite large differences in temporal (and spatial) scales, such patterns may be consistent with malformation-induced morphologies observed in culture experiments, where normal coccolith formation resumes after environmental stress subsides. In contrast, our findings indicate that Toweius type II appeared before the EECO and that it persisted for more than 3 million years, far exceeding the duration of transient malformations recorded during the PETM. This prolonged presence suggests that Toweius type II represents a stable evolutionary lineage rather than a short-lived ecological stress response, supporting its interpretation as a product of true speciation rather than an environmentally induced phenotype or malformation. Based on this interpretation, Toweius type II warrants a formal taxonomic placement as a new species within Toweius (see Appendix), representing an evolutionary line extending from Prinsius through Toweius (likely T. rotundus; see nannotax).

The spatial and temporal distribution of Toweius type II underscores its ecological and physiological significance. This morphotype is predominantly found in tropical regions, particularly in the equatorial Atlantic and Pacific, but is absent in other low-latitude deep-sea sites and well-preserved material from the Tanzania Drilling Project. This absence suggests that Toweius type II may have been confined to specific environmental conditions present in pelagic, near-equatorial regions. Given this biogeographical restriction, we posit that Toweius type II may be a tropical phenomenon, potentially shaped by distinct ecological constraints such as temperature, water column structure, or nutrient availability, which might have influenced its evolutionary trajectory during the early Eocene. While previous studies of Toweius have often generalized ecological preferences at the genus level, the genus exhibits broad morphological and genetic variation (Bown, 2010), indicating that individual species likely occupied diverse ecological niches. Self-Trail et al. (2012) show that species such as T. serotinus, T. callosus, and T. occultatus preferred warmer waters, while T. eminens and T. tovae favored cooler environments. On this basis, one could argue that Toweius phenotypical varieties are underpinned by species-specific physiological adaptation and ecological tolerance along biogeographical and environmental gradients.

Our study reveals that all the species represented in Toweius type I (known Toweius species) underwent an abrupt decline during the peak phase of EECO warming (Fig. 4b). The multi-million-year scale of this warming event – approximately 40 times longer in duration than the PETM – suggests that the physiological and ecological thresholds of Toweius type I were exceeded in the tropics. Previous studies concluded that heat stress and widespread oligotrophy likely acted as primary drivers, preventing any recovery (e.g., Agnini et al., 2006; Schneider et al., 2011; Asanbe and Henderiks, 2025). In contrast, Toweius type II persisted for an additional 2 million years, meaning that these two Toweius morphotypes show distinct ecological tolerance, with the peak EECO interval representing a critical warm and oligotrophic threshold. Combined, the inherently smaller coccolith size, thickness, and mass of Toweius type II suggest that overall lighter calcification may have been better suited to EECO conditions.

However, the emergence of Toweius type II before the EECO renders the hypothesis of a temporary physiological response or trait adaptation to environmental stress unlikely. Therefore, we propose that the abundance pattern of Toweius across the peak EECO is underpinned by morphotype selection related to (latitudinally controlled) environmental factors. Several observations from both modern ecosystems and the fossil record indicate that population shifts in Emiliania huxleyi morphotypes with varying degrees of calcification are driven by morphotype selection (Triantaphyllou et al., 2010; Beaufort et al., 2011; Meier et al., 2014a). As with taxonomic changes, these studies show that the turnover between heavier or lighter calcified morphotypes occurs in response to environmental changes and selection rather than through direct morphological alterations within existing species or morphotypes. It is, however, important to note that there is no consensus on how selective pressures favor differently calcified species/morphotypes in response to ocean chemistry, and no direct relationship has been established with other environmental parameters such as temperature and nutrient availability (Meier et al., 2014b; McClelland et al., 2016). Given the high CO₂ levels, prolonged warming, and low-nutrient conditions that characterized the peak EECO, it is plausible that reduced calcification in Toweius type II was underpinned by genetic regulation and associated with specific physiological adaptations. Because these adaptations may not be consistent in other lightly calcified species, we interpret this phenomenon as a taxon-specific ecological and physiological adaptation (Bolton and Stoll, 2013; Bach et al., 2015).

Beyond the degree of calcification, the large central-area-to-rim ratio – a defining characteristic of Toweius type II – also likely represents a form of ecological adaptation. This ratio is size independent and defines the extent of the central area, including regions occupied by pores, bars, or nets. Young (1987) proposed that the extent of central area opening may play a vital physiological role in cell–seawater interactions. This hypothesis was further described using an ecological model in a recent study (Ma et al., 2024), which proposed that a larger central opening may enhance nutrient uptake via mixotrophy. Although this model was applied to the adaptive morphology of large-celled Reticulofenestra, the enhanced nutrient acquisition central to this hypothesis might be relevant in explaining the prominence of small, relatively fast-growing species in stable oligotrophic environments. In the modern equatorial Pacific Ocean, medium-sized Gephyrocapsa oceanica with wide central areas are more abundant in stable oligotrophic environments than morphotypes with narrower central areas (Hagino et al., 2000). This indicates that the role of the central opening in ecological adaptation might be consistent across different nannoplankton species and morphotypes.

Our study demonstrates that the evolutionary emergence of novel morphotypes within the Toweius lineage occurred in the early Eocene, prior to the EECO. In a broader context of evolution, the timing of the appearance of Toweius type II is comparable to the early Eocene speciation of Reticulofenestra from Toweius (Agnini et al., 2006; Schneider et al., 2011). However, the emergence of these two taxa occurred in distinct biogeographic settings. While Toweius type II has so far been reported only in the tropics, Reticulofenestra first appeared in the Southern Ocean before expanding northward (Schneider et al., 2011). In addition to their distinct biogeographic origins, these taxa exhibit contrasting patterns in coccolith element loss: Reticulofenestra lost the V unit, whereas Toweius type II lost the R unit. This pattern of structural modifications suggests that Toweius likely underwent multiple evolutionary pathways during the early Eocene, with Reticulofenestra ultimately representing the most successful evolutionary adaptation. Throughout the Cenozoic, Reticulofenestra underwent repeated bursts of morphological diversification (e.g., Young, 1990; Bown et al., 2004; Henderiks, 2008; Bendif et al., 2019; Henderiks et al., 2022; Ma et al., 2024). In contrast, while the ecological prominence of Toweius type II in tropical regions suggests it was a true species with a specialized adaptation to EECO conditions, its possible latitudinal restriction and decline during the subsequent cooling interval indicate a narrow ecological tolerance that ultimately limited its long-term success.