48 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Bottom water redox conditions and benthic foraminiferal morphogroup response in the Late Cretaceous Sverdrup Basin, Arctic Canada: Implications for Oceanic Anoxic Event 3 M. Davies et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2020.104449
2. Albian to Turonian agglutinated foraminiferal assemblages of the Lower Saxony Cretaceous sub-basins – implications for sequence stratigraphy and paleoenvironmental interpretation R. Besen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/fr-24-395-2021
3. The morphogroups of small agglutinated foraminifera from the Devonian carbonate complex of the Prague Synform, (Barrandian area, Czech Republic) K. Holcová & L. Slavík https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.05.022
4. The Late Cretaceous–Early Paleocene palaeobathymetric trends in the southwestern Barents Sea — Palaeoenvironmental implications of benthic foraminiferal assemblage analysis E. Setoyama et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2011.04.021
5. Early–Middle Cenomanian foraminifera and ostracods from BB‐80‐1 well, Gulf of Suez, Egypt: Biostratigraphy, palaeoecology, and palaeobiogeographic significance A. Shahin & S. El Baz https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.4131
6. Trends in temperature, salinity and productivity in the Vienna Basin (Austria) during the early and middle Miocene, based on foraminiferal ecology M. Kranner et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2021.110640
7. The oxic Coniacian-Santonian interval in the Kopet-Dagh Basin (NE Iran): Carbon isotope and benthic-planktic foraminiferal assemblages at the time of the last Cretaceous OAE B. Kalanat et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2021.110817
8. Palaeoenvironmental changes across the Albian-Cenomanian boundary interval of the Eastern Carpathians M. Melinte-Dobrinescu et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2014.10.010
9. Abyssal record of the Middle Eocene Climatic Optimum in the Tasman Sea: Insights from benthic foraminiferal and clay mineral assemblages I. Peñalver-Clavel et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2026.113590
10. Carboniferous smaller Foraminifera: convergences and divergences D. Vachard & F. Le Coze https://doi.org/10.1144/SP512-2020-42
11. Paleoenvironmental changes recorded at a late Maastrichtian marine succession of northern South America G. Patarroyo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2022.104015
12. BENTHIC FORAMINIFERAL MORPHOGROUPS AND TRACE FOSSILS FROM ALBIAN SHALLOW-MARINE MUDSTONE FACIES OF THE VIKING FORMATION, WESTERN INTERIOR SEAWAY, CANADA D. MCNEIL & J. MACEACHERN https://doi.org/10.2110/palo.2022.041
13. The colourful optical appearance of centric diatom fossil frustules with diagenetic nanocrystalline calcite fill M. Liesegang et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10347-023-00675-6
14. The Campanian–Maastrichtian interval at The Naze, James Ross Island, Antarctica: microbiostratigraphic and paleoenvironmental study E. Piovesan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2020.104725
15. Post Cretaceous/Paleogene boundary recovery of the deep marine ecosystem recorded by benthic foraminiferal morphogroups M. Kaminski et al. https://doi.org/10.4202/app.01227.2024
16. BATHYSIPHON (FORAMINIFERIDA) AT PACHECO PASS, CALIFORNIA: A GEOPETAL, PALEOCURRENT, AND PALEOBATHYMETRIC INDICATOR IN THE FRANCISCAN COMPLEX D. SAJA et al. https://doi.org/10.2110/palo.2008.p08-037r
17. Deep-sea benthic foraminiferal recolonisation following a volcaniclastic event in the lower Campanian of the Scaglia Rossa Formation (Umbria–Marche Basin, central Italy) S. Galeotti et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8398(01)00037-8
18. Ostracod assemblages from the Maastrichtian Colón formation, Colombia: Taxonomy and Paleoecological inferences before the K–Pg boundary G. Patarroyo et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsames.2025.105807
19. Interpreting bioevents: What exactly did happen to planktonic foraminifers across the Cretaceous–Tertiary boundary? C. Paul https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.03.038
20. Benthic foraminifera across the Albian–Cenomanian transition and their paleoceanographic significance during OAE1d in the western Tethys (Umbria–Marche Basin, Italy) V. Giraldo-Gómez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2023.111820
21. Composition and diversity patterns of deep sea benthic foraminifera from the Panama basin, eastern equatorial Pacific G. Patarroyo & J. Martinez https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr.2021.103470
22. A new look at modern agglutinated benthic foraminiferal morphogroups: their value in palaeoecological interpretation J. Murray et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2011.06.006
23. Assessing the ecological preferences of agglutinated benthic foraminiferal morphogroups from the western Bay of Bengal S. Saalim et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsr2.2018.02.002
24. Agglutinated foraminifera from the Turonian–Coniacian boundary interval in Europe – paleoenvironmental remarks and stratigraphy R. Besen et al. https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-42-117-2023
25. Late Paleocene foraminiferal faunas withChapmaninaandReticulophragmiumfrom offshore southeastern Australia: a Tethyan influence P. Quilty & G. Packham https://doi.org/10.1080/03115510608619320
26. Middle Devonian parathuramminid and earlandiid foraminifers from shallow marine carbonates of the Carnic Alps (Austria) D. Vachard et al. https://doi.org/10.1017/jpa.2017.127
27. Early Burdigalian infill of the Puchkirchen Trough (North Alpine Foreland Basin, Central Paratethys): Facies development and sequence stratigraphy P. Grunert et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2012.08.009
28. Integrated biostratigraphy and palaeoenvironments of an upper Santonian – upper Campanian succession from the southern part of the Eastern Carpathians, Romania C. Cetean et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2010.11.001
29. Upper Cretaceous Foraminifera and Palynomorphs from Ekelöf Coast Section, EKelöf Point, Eastern James Ross Island, Antarctic Peninsula A. Caramés et al. https://doi.org/10.5710/AMGH.27.01.2016.2963
30. The European Micropaleontological Reference Center and its role in the preservation and management of micropaleontological collections A. Waśkowska et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.revmic.2026.100902
31. RETRACTED: Depositional environments and sea-level fluctuations interpreted through qualitative and quantitative analyses of foraminiferal contents: A case study from Gebel Owaina, Nile Valley, Egypt O. Orabi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2026.106147
32. Middle Campanian to Maastrichtian foraminifera and biomarkers: Seawater incursion events in the Songliao Basin, Northeast China K. Yue et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palwor.2025.200958
33. The potential of Middle Eocene to early Miocene benthic foraminifera as paleoecological indicators in the Qattara Depression, Western desert, Egypt A. Shahin et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2025.105668
34. Stratigraphy of Maastrichtian Foraminiferida from the United Kingdom; the Maastrichtian of Norfolk M. Hart & T. Swiecicki https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016774600020825
35. Unravelling Tectono‐Eustatic Dynamics in Jurassic Mixed Siliciclastic–Carbonate Systems: A Benthic Foraminiferal Record From the Binalud Tethyan Gateway, NE Iran E. Behforouzi et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.70270
36. Paleoceanographic inferences from benthic foraminifera across the early Aptian Ocean Anoxic Event 1a in the western Tethys V. Giraldo-Gómez et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2021.110803
37. New data on the incertae sedis biota and foraminifera of the mid-Famennian Baelen Member (Late Devonian, eastern Belgium) D. Vachard et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12549-016-0263-y
38. Late Cretaceous dysoxia in a southern high latitude siliciclastic succession, the Otway Basin, southeastern Australia S. Gallagher et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.04.017
39. Relationship of Maastrichtian–Thanetian benthic foraminiferal species diversity, palaeooxygenation, and palaeoproductivity in shallow waters of the Western Desert, Egypt S. Farouk et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00367-023-00745-2
40. Integrated biostratigraphy and palaeoenvironmental interpretation of the Upper Cretaceous to Paleocene succession in the northern Moldavidian Domain (Eastern Carpathians, Romania) D. Ţabără et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2017.04.021
41. Foraminiferal biofacies and depositional environments of the Burdigalian mixed carbonate and siliciclastic Dam Formation, Al-Lidam area, Eastern Province of Saudi Arabia S. Chan et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2016.12.041
42. The response of benthic foraminifera to the K–Pg boundary biotic crisis at Elles (northwestern Tunisia) R. Coccioni & A. Marsili https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2007.02.046
43. Foraminiferal and palynological biostratigraphy and biofacies from a Santonian–Campanian submarine fan system in the Vøring Basin (offshore Norway) E. Setoyama et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2012.12.007
44. Latest Hauterivian foraminiferal and calcareous nannofossil assemblages and bioevents from the Pseudothurmannia beds (Central Western Carpathians, Slovakia): A prelude to the Faraoni event Š. Józsa et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cretres.2022.105457
45. Benthic foraminiferal insights into Middle Jurassic paleoenvironmental dynamics along the Neotethyan margin: From regional transitions to supra-regional trends E. Behforouzi et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palwor.2026.201136
46. Maastrichtian Microfossils of the Shallow Marine Umir Formation, Northeastern Colombia G. Patarroyo et al. https://doi.org/10.5710/AMGH.02.03.2023.3525
47. Benthonic foraminifera in the Upper Miocene Cruse Formation at Quinam Bay, Trinidad, western tropical Atlantic Ocean, and their palaeoenvironmental significance B. WILSON & H. VINCENT https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756813000496
48. Paleoambientes en la parte central del Cinturón Plegado de San Jacinto (Caribe colombiano) durante el Eoceno tardío y el Mioceno temprano: inferencias a partir de foraminíferos bentónicos R. Trejos-Tamayo et al. https://doi.org/10.18273/revbol.v46n3-2024007