61 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. Fungal colonization of the rooting system of the early land plantAsteroxylon mackieifrom the 407-Myr-old Rhynie Chert (Scotland, UK) C. Strullu-Derrien et al. 10.1111/boj.12307
2. A perfect flower from the Jurassic of China Z. Liu & X. Wang 10.1080/08912963.2015.1020423
3. Molecular and Fossil Evidence on the Origin of Angiosperms J. Doyle 10.1146/annurev-earth-042711-105313
4. The corbiculate bees arose from New World oil-collecting bees: Implications for the origin of pollen baskets A. Martins et al. 10.1016/j.ympev.2014.07.003
5. A Jurassic flower bud from China D. Cui et al. 10.1144/SP521-2021-122
6. Pollen micro-morphometry of two endangered species of Rauvolfia L. (Apocynaceae) from the Indo-Gangetic Plains of Central India using LM, CLSM and FESEM S. Tripathi et al. 10.1080/01916122.2022.2072966
7. Establishing a time‐scale for plant evolution J. Clarke et al. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03794.x
8. Three-Dimensional Confocal Optical Imagery of Precambrian Microscopic Organisms J. Schopf et al. 10.1089/ast.2006.6.1
9. Confocal (CLSM) and light (LM) photomicrographs of different plant pollen taxa from Lucknow, India: Implications of pollen morphology for systematics, phylogeny and preservation M. Firoze Quamar et al. 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2017.09.005
10. Palaeobotanical redux: revisiting the age of the angiosperms P. Herendeen et al. 10.1038/nplants.2017.15
11. ПРИМЕНЕНИЕ КОНФОКАЛЬНОЙ ЛАЗЕРНОЙ СКАНИРУЮЩЕЙ МИКРОСКОПИИ ДЛЯ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЯ МОРФОЛОГИИ ОБОЛОЧКИ ПЫЛЬЦЕВЫХ ЗЕРЕН, "БОТАНИЧЕСКИЙ ЖУРНАЛ" О. ГАВРИЛОВА 10.1134/S1234567814100085
12. Was Charles Darwin right in his explanation of the ‘abominable mystery’? S. Sgorbati et al. 10.3897/ib.5.24699
13. Yuhania: a unique angiosperm from the Middle Jurassic of Inner Mongolia, China Z. Liu & X. Wang 10.1080/08912963.2016.1178740
14. Schmeissneria: An angiosperm from the Early Jurassic X. WANG 10.1111/j.1759-6831.2010.00090.x
15. 40 Ar/ 39 Ar age constraints on the Haifanggou and Lanqi formations: When did the first flowers bloom? S. Chang et al. 10.1144/SP378.1
16. An Undercover Angiosperm from the Jurassic of China Z. Shaolin & W. Xin 10.1111/j.1755-6724.2010.00252.x
17. How deep is the conflict between molecular and fossil evidence on the age of angiosperms? M. Coiro et al. 10.1111/nph.15708
18. Using More Than the Oldest Fossils: Dating Osmundaceae with Three Bayesian Clock Approaches G. Grimm et al. 10.1093/sysbio/syu108
19. The effects of the Jenkyns Event on the radiation of Early Jurassic dinoflagellate cysts V. Correia et al. 10.1144/SP514-2020-255
20. Confocal laser scanning microscopy and Raman imagery of the late Neoproterozoic Chichkan microbiota of South Kazakhstan J. Schopf et al. 10.1666/09-134.1
21. Is Darwin's ‘Abominable Mystery’ still a mystery today? B. Cascales-Miñana et al. 10.1016/j.cretres.2016.01.002
22. Application of confocal laser-scanning microscopy (CLSM) to autofluorescent organic and mineral matter in peat, coals and siliciclastic sedimentary rocks — A qualitative approach J. Kus 10.1016/j.coal.2014.10.014
23. Fossil data support a pre-Cretaceous origin of flowering plants D. Silvestro et al. 10.1038/s41559-020-01387-8
24. Thermal maturity of Tasmanites microfossils from confocal laser scanning fluorescence microscopy P. Hackley & J. Kus 10.1016/j.fuel.2014.11.052
25. Late Triassic (early Carnian) palynology of shallow stratigraphical core 7830/5-U-1, offshore Kong Karls Land, Norwegian Arctic N. Paterson et al. 10.1080/01916122.2016.1163295
26. The vanishing Carib Halite Formation (Neocomian), Colombia-Venezuela-Trinidad prolific petroleum province R. Higgs 10.1144/SP328.26
27. Reconstructing the Callianthus plant–An early aquatic angiosperm from the Lower Cretaceous of China X. Wang et al. 10.1016/j.cretres.2021.104983
28. Celebrating 25 years of advances in micropalaeontology: a review F. Gregory et al. 10.1144/jm.25.2.97
29. Scandium Ore Occurrences in the Ancient Weathering Crust in the Nakyn Kimberlite Field of Yakutia P. Ignatov et al. 10.31857/S0016777023060059
30. The Unique Pollen Morphology of Duparquetia (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae): Developmental Evidence of Aperture Orientation Using Confocal Microscopy H. BANKS et al. 10.1093/aob/mcl115
31. In situ confocal laser scanning microscopy and Raman spectroscopy of bisaccate pollen from the Irati Subgroup (Permian, Paraná Basin, Brazil): Comparison with acid-macerated specimens J. Schopf et al. 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2016.03.004
32. Xingxueanthus: An Enigmatic Jurassic Seed Plant and Its Implications for the Origin of Angiospermy X. WANG & S. WANG 10.1111/j.1755-6724.2010.00169.x
33. South-Central Barents Sea Composite Tectono-Sedimentary Element A. Doré et al. 10.1144/M57-2017-42
34. Climate variations in the Boreal Triassic — Inferred from palynological records from the Barents Sea P. Hochuli & J. Vigran 10.1016/j.palaeo.2009.08.013
35. A Whole Plant Herbaceous Angiosperm from the Middle Jurassic of China H. Gang et al. 10.1111/1755-6724.12592
36. Potential of CLSM in studying some modern and fossil palynological objects O. GAVRILOVA et al. 10.1111/jmi.12639
37. New Fossil Evidence Suggests That Angiosperms Flourished in the Middle Jurassic L. Han et al. 10.3390/life13030819
38. Capturing the Surface Texture and Shape of Pollen: A Comparison of Microscopy Techniques M. Sivaguru et al. 10.1371/journal.pone.0039129
39. Integrating Molecular Phylogenetic and Paleobotanical Evidence on Origin of the Flower J. Doyle 10.1086/589887
40. Was Charles Darwin right in his explanation of the ‘abominable mystery’? S. Sgorbati et al. 10.3897/italianbotanist.5.24699
41. Pollen characters and their evolutionary and taxonomic significance: using light and confocal laser scanning microscope to study diverse plant pollen taxa from central India M. Quamar et al. 10.1080/01916122.2022.2070294
42. Cretaceous angiosperm flowers: Innovation and evolution in plant reproduction E. Friis et al. 10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.07.006
43. Morphometrical analysis of Ceiba Mill. (Bombacoideae, Malvaceae) pollen: a sacred plant of the Mayan (Mesoamerican) civilisation S. Tripathi et al. 10.1080/01916122.2018.1467350
44. Monocotyledon‐like Leaves from the Middle Jurassic of East Siberia (Russia) A. FROLOV & I. ENUSHCHENKO 10.1111/1755-6724.14986
45. Biogeographical affinities of the New Caledonian biota: a puzzle with 24 pieces M. Heads 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2010.02311.x
46. The Core Eudicot Boom Registered in Myanmar Amber Z. Liu et al. 10.1038/s41598-018-35100-4
47. Recognition of peat depositional environments in coal: A review S. Dai et al. 10.1016/j.coal.2019.103383
48. Micro-CT results exhibit ovules enclosed in the ovaries of Nanjinganthus Q. Fu et al. 10.1038/s41598-022-27334-0
49. A confocal laser scanning and conventional wide field light microscopy study ofClassopollisfrom the Toarcian‐Aalenian of the Fuentelsaz section (Spain) D. Peyrot et al. 10.1080/00173130701782845
50. A Novel Angiosperm from the Early Cretaceous and Its Implications for Carpel‐Deriving Z. LIU & X. WANG 10.1111/1755-6724.13627
51. The megafossil record of early angiosperms in China since 1930s X. Wang 10.1080/08912963.2014.889695
52. The identification of fossil angiosperm pollen and its bearing on the time and place of the origin of angiosperms M. Zavada 10.1007/s00606-006-0495-9
53. Integrating Early Cretaceous Fossils into the Phylogeny of Living Angiosperms: ANITA Lines and Relatives of Chloranthaceae J. Doyle & P. Endress 10.1086/675935
54. Early evolution of angiosperm pollen as inferred from molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses J. Doyle 10.1080/00173130500424557
55. Pollen heteromorphism in Schleichera Lour. (Sapindaceae), observed in surface soil samples from central India M. Quamar et al. 10.35535/acpa-2021-0003
56. The palaeoenvironment associated with a partial Iguanodon skeleton from the Upper Weald Clay (Barremian, Early Cretaceous) at Smokejacks Brickworks (Ockley, Surrey, UK), based on palynomorphs and ostracods E. Nye et al. 10.1016/j.cretres.2008.01.004
57. Early Cretaceous angiosperm pollen from a low-latitude succession (Araripe Basin, NE Brazil) U. Heimhofer & P. Hochuli 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2010.03.010
58. An unexpected noncarpellate epigynous flower from the Jurassic of China Q. Fu et al. 10.7554/eLife.38827
59. A Biased, Misleading Review on Early Angiosperms X. Wang 10.4236/ns.2017.912037
60. Peter Andreas Hochuli (1946–2018) . Elke Schneebeli-Hermann et al. 10.1080/01916122.2018.1521838
61. Heterogeneous Rates of Molecular Evolution and Diversification Could Explain the Triassic Age Estimate for Angiosperms J. Beaulieu et al. 10.1093/sysbio/syv027