9 citations as recorded by crossref.

1. The relationship between archaeological stratigraphy and artificial ground and its significance in the Anthropocene M. Edgeworth https://doi.org/10.1144/SP395.3
2. Provenance of clay used in Garamantian ceramics from Jarma, Fazzan region (south-west Libya): A combined geochemical and microfossil analysis V. Leitch et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.08.030
3. Medieval land remediation of a quarry site at Wallingford, Oxfordshire, revealed by microfossil analysis D. Janssen et al. https://doi.org/10.1179/1461410313Z.00000000056
4. Microfossil-determined provenance of clay building materials at Burrough Hill Iron Age hill fort, Leicestershire, England M. Williams et al. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2014.03.028
5. Morphological and mineralogical evolution of microfossils during the heating process: a contribution to the archaeometric study of ceramics A. Privitera et al. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12210-015-0443-0
6. Foraminiferal biozones and their relationship to the lithostratigraphy of the Chalk Group of southern England I. Wilkinson https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pgeola.2011.10.002
7. Multiproxy approach based on image analysis, petrography, mineralogy and micropaleontology to compare carved limestone fragments, application to the study of a broken stone recumbent (Beatrix d’Avesnes, Valenciennes) É. Armynot du Châtelet et al. https://doi.org/10.4000/12w35
8. Source of soft mudstone gravel in the Atami debris flow deposits based on a paleontological study A. Kitamura et al. https://doi.org/10.4116/jaqua.65.2521
9. Nonmarine Ostracoda as proxies in (geo‐)archaeology — A review E. Quante et al. https://doi.org/10.1002/gea.21912