Articles | Volume 37, issue 1
https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-37-203-2018
https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-37-203-2018
Research article
 | 
29 Jan 2018
Research article |  | 29 Jan 2018

Benthic foraminifera or Ostracoda? Comparing the accuracy of palaeoenvironmental indicators from a Pleistocene lagoon of the Romagna coastal plain (Italy)

Giulia Barbieri and Stefano Claudio Vaiani

Viewed

Total article views: 3,009 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total Supplement BibTeX EndNote
2,167 755 87 3,009 148 59 65
  • HTML: 2,167
  • PDF: 755
  • XML: 87
  • Total: 3,009
  • Supplement: 148
  • BibTeX: 59
  • EndNote: 65
Views and downloads (calculated since 29 Jan 2018)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 29 Jan 2018)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 2,594 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 2,555 with geography defined and 39 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 

Cited

Latest update: 23 Nov 2024
Download
Short summary
The challenge between benthic foraminifera and ostracoda is open: which is the most reliable microfossil group for precise palaeoenvironmental reconstructions? Results from a lagoonal succession of the Romagna coast (Italy) reveal that the winner is ostracoda, due to their higher abundance, higher differentiation, and precise relationships between species and ecological parameters. Nevertheless, palaeoenvironmental stress and additional details are provided by benthic foraminifera.