Articles | Volume 45, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-45-577-2026
https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-45-577-2026
Comment/reply
 | 
03 Aug 2026
Comment/reply |  | 03 Aug 2026

Reply to Papazzoni et al.'s comment on “Chronostratigraphic ranges of Early–Middle Miocene larger benthic foraminifera calibrated by planktonic foraminiferal assemblages (Sierra de Marmolance, Granada, SE Spain)” by Bolivar-Feriche et al. (2025)

Mónica Bolivar-Feriche, Jesús Reolid, Julio Aguirre, Davide Bassi, and Juan C. Braga

Viewed

Total article views: 84 (including HTML, PDF, and XML)
HTML PDF XML Total BibTeX EndNote
57 20 7 84 8 8
  • HTML: 57
  • PDF: 20
  • XML: 7
  • Total: 84
  • BibTeX: 8
  • EndNote: 8
Views and downloads (calculated since 03 Aug 2026)
Cumulative views and downloads (calculated since 03 Aug 2026)

Viewed (geographical distribution)

Total article views: 59 (including HTML, PDF, and XML) Thereof 59 with geography defined and 0 with unknown origin.
Country # Views %
  • 1
1
 
 
 
 
Latest update: 23 Aug 2026
Download
Short summary
In the Marmolance succession (SE Spain), in limestones intercalating marls with planktonic foraminifera, we documented Langhian Nummulites species as well as Serravallian lepidocyclinids and Risananeiza. Papazzoni et al. questioned our results, arguing that the larger benthic foraminifera (LBF) must be reworked. However, the quantitatively defined LBF assemblages are spatially and temporally segregated, which can only be due to in situ accumulation across different facies belts of the carbonate ramp.
Share