Articles | Volume 32, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.1144/jmpaleo2012-022
© Author(s) 2013. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
01 Jul 2013
| 01 Jul 2013
The Helgoland Experiment – assessing the influence of methodologies on Recent benthic foraminiferal assemblage composition
Related authors
EGUsphere, 2025
This preprint is open for discussion and under review for Biogeosciences (BG).
Biogeosciences, 19, 629–664, 2022
J. Micropalaeontol., 40, 195–223, 2021
Biogeosciences, 17, 3165–3182, 2020
J. Micropalaeontol., 38, 231–247, 2019
Biogeosciences, 15, 7077–7095, 2018
J. Micropalaeontol., 37, 383–393, 2018
Biogeosciences, 12, 1169–1189, 2015
Biogeosciences, 11, 1581–1597, 2014
Cited articles
A. V., Altenbach, U., Pflaumann, R., Schiebel, A., Thies, S., Timm and M., Trauth: Scaling percentages and distributional patterns of benthic foraminifera with flux rates of organic carbon, Journal of Foraminiferal Research, 29, 173-185, 1999.
C., Barras, C., Fontanier, F., Jorissen and J., Hohenegger: A comparison of spatial and temporal variability of living benthic foraminiferal faunas at 550 m depth in the Bay of Biscay, Micropaleontology, 56, 275-295, 2010.
H., Bender: Gehäuseaufbau, Gehäusegenese und Biologie agglutinierter Foraminiferen (Sarcodina, Textulariina), Jahrbuch der geologischen Bundesanstalt, 132, 259-347, 1989.
J. M., Bernhard: Distinguishing live from dead foraminifera: methods review and proper applications, Micropaleontology, 46, 38-46, 2000.
J. M., Bernhard, D. R., Ostermann, D. S., Williams and J. K., Blanks: Comparison of two methods to identify live benthic foraminifera: a test between Rose Bengal and CellTracker Green with implications for stable isotope paleoreconstructionsPaleoceanography, 21: PA4210, http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2006PA001290., 2006.
