Articles | Volume 37, issue 2
https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-37-519-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-37-519-2018
© Author(s) 2018. This work is distributed under
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Research article
| 
04 Dec 2018
Research article |
| 04 Dec 2018
| 04 Dec 2018
Reproducibility of species recognition in modern planktonic foraminifera and its implications for analyses of community structure
Nadia Al-Sabouni
20a Western Road, Milton Keynes, MK12 5BE, UK
Isabel S. Fenton
CORRESPONDING AUTHOR
Department of Life Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, SW7 5BD, UK
Richard J. Telford
Department of Biology, University of Bergen, 5007, Bergen, Norway
Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, 5007, Bergen, Norway
Michal Kučera
MARUM Center for Marine Environmental Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, 28359, Germany
Related authors
No articles found.
Sabrina Hohmann, Michal Kucera, and Anne de Vernal
Clim. Past, 19, 2027–2051, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-2027-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-19-2027-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Drivers for dinocyst assemblage compositions differ regionally and through time. Shifts in the assemblages can sometimes only be interpreted robustly by locally and sometimes globally calibrated transfer functions, questioning the reliability of environmental reconstructions. We suggest the necessity of a thorough evaluation of transfer function performance and significance for downcore applications to disclose the drivers for present and fossil dinocyst assemblages in a studied core location.
Michal Kučera and Geert-Jan A. Brummer
J. Micropalaeontol., 42, 33–34, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-42-33-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-42-33-2023, 2023
Pauline Cornuault, Thomas Westerhold, Heiko Pälike, Torsten Bickert, Karl-Heinz Baumann, and Michal Kucera
Biogeosciences, 20, 597–618, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-597-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-20-597-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
We generated high-resolution records of carbonate accumulation rate from the Miocene to the Quaternary in the tropical Atlantic Ocean to characterize the variability in pelagic carbonate production during warm climates. It follows orbital cycles, responding to local changes in tropical conditions, as well as to long-term shifts in climate and ocean chemistry. These changes were sufficiently large to play a role in the carbon cycle and global climate evolution.
Franziska Tell, Lukas Jonkers, Julie Meilland, and Michal Kucera
Biogeosciences, 19, 4903–4927, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4903-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-19-4903-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
This study analyses the production of calcite shells formed by one of the main Arctic pelagic calcifiers, the foraminifera N. pachyderma. Using vertically resolved profiles of shell concentration, size and weight, we show that calcification occurs throughout the upper 300 m with an average production flux below the calcification zone of 8 mg CaCO3 m−2 d−1 representing 23 % of the total pelagic biogenic carbonate production. The production flux is attenuated in the twilight zone by dissolution.
Geert-Jan A. Brummer and Michal Kučera
J. Micropalaeontol., 41, 29–74, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-41-29-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-41-29-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
To aid researchers working with living planktonic foraminifera, we provide a comprehensive review of names that we consider appropriate for extant species. We discuss the reasons for the decisions we made and provide a list of species and genus-level names as well as other names that have been used in the past but are considered inappropriate for living taxa, stating the reasons.
Lukas Jonkers, Geert-Jan A. Brummer, Julie Meilland, Jeroen Groeneveld, and Michal Kucera
Clim. Past, 18, 89–101, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-18-89-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-18-89-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The variability in the geochemistry among individual foraminifera is used to reconstruct seasonal to interannual climate variability. This method requires that each foraminifera shell accurately records environmental conditions, which we test here using a sediment trap time series. Even in the absence of environmental variability, planktonic foraminifera display variability in their stable isotope ratios that needs to be considered in the interpretation of individual foraminifera data.
Lukas Jonkers, Oliver Bothe, and Michal Kucera
Clim. Past, 17, 2577–2581, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-2577-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-2577-2021, 2021
Julie Meilland, Michael Siccha, Maike Kaffenberger, Jelle Bijma, and Michal Kucera
Biogeosciences, 18, 5789–5809, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5789-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-18-5789-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
Planktonic foraminifera population dynamics has long been assumed to be controlled by synchronous reproduction and ontogenetic vertical migration (OVM). Due to contradictory observations, this concept became controversial. We here test it in the Atlantic ocean for four species of foraminifera representing the main clades. Our observations support the existence of synchronised reproduction and OVM but show that more than half of the population does not follow the canonical trajectory.
Markus Raitzsch, Jelle Bijma, Torsten Bickert, Michael Schulz, Ann Holbourn, and Michal Kučera
Clim. Past, 17, 703–719, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-703-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-703-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
At approximately 14 Ma, the East Antarctic Ice Sheet expanded to almost its current extent, but the role of CO2 in this major climate transition is not entirely known. We show that atmospheric CO2 might have varied on 400 kyr cycles linked to the eccentricity of the Earth’s orbit. The resulting change in weathering and ocean carbon cycle affected atmospheric CO2 in a way that CO2 rose after Antarctica glaciated, helping to stabilize the climate system on its way to the “ice-house” world.
Catarina Cavaleiro, Antje H. L. Voelker, Heather Stoll, Karl-Heinz Baumann, and Michal Kucera
Clim. Past, 16, 2017–2037, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2017-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-16-2017-2020, 2020
Douglas Lessa, Raphaël Morard, Lukas Jonkers, Igor M. Venancio, Runa Reuter, Adrian Baumeister, Ana Luiza Albuquerque, and Michal Kucera
Biogeosciences, 17, 4313–4342, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4313-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-17-4313-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
We observed that living planktonic foraminifera had distinct vertically distributed communities across the Subtropical South Atlantic. In addition, a hierarchic alternation of environmental parameters was measured to control the distribution of planktonic foraminifer's species depending on the water depth. This implies that not only temperature but also productivity and subsurface processes are signed in fossil assemblages, which could be used to perform paleoceanographic reconstructions.
Lukas Jonkers, Olivier Cartapanis, Michael Langner, Nick McKay, Stefan Mulitza, Anne Strack, and Michal Kucera
Earth Syst. Sci. Data, 12, 1053–1081, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1053-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-12-1053-2020, 2020
Anna Jentzen, Joachim Schönfeld, Agnes K. M. Weiner, Manuel F. G. Weinkauf, Dirk Nürnberg, and Michal Kučera
J. Micropalaeontol., 38, 231–247, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-38-231-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-38-231-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The study assessed the population dynamics of living planktic foraminifers on a weekly, seasonal, and interannual timescale off the coast of Puerto Rico to improve our understanding of short- and long-term variations. The results indicate a seasonal change of the faunal composition, and over the last decades. Lower standing stocks and lower stable carbon isotope values of foraminifers in shallow waters can be linked to the hurricane Sandy, which passed the Greater Antilles during autumn 2012.
Mattia Greco, Lukas Jonkers, Kerstin Kretschmer, Jelle Bijma, and Michal Kucera
Biogeosciences, 16, 3425–3437, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-3425-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-3425-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
To be able to interpret the paleoecological signal contained in N. pachyderma's shells, its habitat depth must be known. Our investigation on 104 density profiles of this species from the Arctic and North Atlantic shows that specimens reside closer to the surface when sea-ice and/or surface chlorophyll concentrations are high. This is in contrast with previous investigations that pointed at the position of the deep chlorophyll maximum as the main driver of N. pachyderma vertical distribution.
Haruka Takagi, Katsunori Kimoto, Tetsuichi Fujiki, Hiroaki Saito, Christiane Schmidt, Michal Kucera, and Kazuyoshi Moriya
Biogeosciences, 16, 3377–3396, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-3377-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-16-3377-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Photosymbiosis (endosymbiosis with algae) is an evolutionary important ecology for many marine organisms but has poorly been identified among planktonic foraminifera. In this study, we identified and characterized photosymbiosis of various species of planktonic foraminifera by focusing on their photosynthesis–related features. We finally proposed a new framework showing a potential strength of photosymbiosis, which will serve as a basis for future ecological studies of planktonic foraminifera.
Andreia Rebotim, Antje Helga Luise Voelker, Lukas Jonkers, Joanna J. Waniek, Michael Schulz, and Michal Kucera
J. Micropalaeontol., 38, 113–131, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-38-113-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-38-113-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
To reconstruct subsurface water conditions using deep-dwelling planktonic foraminifera, we must fully understand how the oxygen isotope signal incorporates into their shell. We report δ18O in four species sampled in the eastern North Atlantic with plankton tows. We assess the size and crust effect on the isotopic δ18O and compared them with predictions from two equations. We reveal different patterns of calcite addition with depth, highlighting the need to perform species-specific calibrations.
Lukas Jonkers and Michal Kučera
Clim. Past, 15, 881–891, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-881-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-15-881-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
Fossil plankton assemblages have been widely used to reconstruct SST. In such approaches, full taxonomic resolution is often used. We assess whether this is required for reliable reconstructions as some species may not respond to SST. We find that only a few species are needed for low reconstruction errors but that species selection has a pronounced effect on reconstructions. We suggest that the sensitivity of a reconstruction to species pruning can be used as a measure of its robustness.
Isabel S. Fenton, Ulrike Baranowski, Flavia Boscolo-Galazzo, Hannah Cheales, Lyndsey Fox, David J. King, Christina Larkin, Marcin Latas, Diederik Liebrand, C. Giles Miller, Katrina Nilsson-Kerr, Emanuela Piga, Hazel Pugh, Serginio Remmelzwaal, Zoe A. Roseby, Yvonne M. Smith, Stephen Stukins, Ben Taylor, Adam Woodhouse, Savannah Worne, Paul N. Pearson, Christopher R. Poole, Bridget S. Wade, and Andy Purvis
J. Micropalaeontol., 37, 431–443, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-37-431-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-37-431-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we investigate consistency in species-level identifications and whether disagreements are predictable. Twenty-three scientists identified a set of 100 planktonic foraminifera, noting their confidence in each identification. The median accuracy of students was 57 %; 79 % for experienced researchers. Where they were confident in the identifications, the values are 75 % and 93 %, respectively. Accuracy was significantly higher if the students had been taught how to identify species.
Kerstin Kretschmer, Lukas Jonkers, Michal Kucera, and Michael Schulz
Biogeosciences, 15, 4405–4429, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-4405-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-15-4405-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
The fossil shells of planktonic foraminifera are widely used to reconstruct past climate conditions. To do so, information about their seasonal and vertical habitat is needed. Here we present an updated version of a planktonic foraminifera model to better understand species-specific habitat dynamics under climate change. This model produces spatially and temporally coherent distribution patterns, which agree well with available observations, and can thus aid the interpretation of proxy records.
Raphaël Morard, Franck Lejzerowicz, Kate F. Darling, Béatrice Lecroq-Bennet, Mikkel Winther Pedersen, Ludovic Orlando, Jan Pawlowski, Stefan Mulitza, Colomban de Vargas, and Michal Kucera
Biogeosciences, 14, 2741–2754, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-2741-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-2741-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
The exploitation of deep-sea sedimentary archive relies on the recovery of mineralized skeletons of pelagic organisms. Planktonic groups leaving preserved remains represent only a fraction of the total marine diversity. Environmental DNA left by non-fossil organisms is a promising source of information for paleo-reconstructions. Here we show how planktonic-derived environmental DNA preserves ecological structure of planktonic communities. We use planktonic foraminifera as a case study.
Lukas Jonkers and Michal Kučera
Clim. Past, 13, 573–586, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-573-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-573-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Planktonic foraminifera – the most important proxy carriers in palaeoceanography – adjust their seasonal and vertical habitat. They are thought to do so in a way that minimises the change in their environment, implying that proxy records based on these organisms may not capture the full amplitude of past climate change. Here we demonstrate that they indeed track a particular thermal habitat and suggest that this could lead to a 40 % underestimation of reconstructed temperature change.
Philipp M. Munz, Stephan Steinke, Anna Böll, Andreas Lückge, Jeroen Groeneveld, Michal Kucera, and Hartmut Schulz
Clim. Past, 13, 491–509, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-491-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-13-491-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
We present the results of several independent proxies of summer SST and upwelling SST from the Oman margin indicative of monsoon strength during the early Holocene. In combination with indices of carbonate preservation and bottom water redox conditions, we demonstrate that a persistent solar influence was modulating summer monsoon intensity. Furthermore, bottom water conditions are linked to atmospheric forcing, rather than changes of intermediate water masses.
Andreia Rebotim, Antje H. L. Voelker, Lukas Jonkers, Joanna J. Waniek, Helge Meggers, Ralf Schiebel, Igaratza Fraile, Michael Schulz, and Michal Kucera
Biogeosciences, 14, 827–859, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-827-2017, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-14-827-2017, 2017
Short summary
Short summary
Planktonic foraminifera species depth habitat remains poorly constrained and the existing conceptual models are not sufficiently tested by observational data. Here we present a synthesis of living planktonic foraminifera abundance data in the subtropical eastern North Atlantic from vertical plankton tows. We also test potential environmental factors influencing the species depth habitat and investigate yearly or lunar migration cycles. These findings may impact paleoceanographic studies.
Kira Rehfeld, Mathias Trachsel, Richard J. Telford, and Thomas Laepple
Clim. Past, 12, 2255–2270, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-2255-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-2255-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
Indirect evidence on past climate comes from the former composition of ecological communities such as plants, preserved as pollen grains in sediments of lakes. Transfer functions convert relative counts of species to a climatologically meaningful scale (e.g. annual mean temperature in degrees C). We show that the fundamental assumptions in the algorithms impact the reconstruction results in he idealized model world, in particular if the reconstructed variables were not ecologically relevant.
Mathias Trachsel and Richard J. Telford
Clim. Past, 12, 1215–1223, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-1215-2016, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-12-1215-2016, 2016
Short summary
Short summary
In spatially structured environments, conventional cross validation results in over-optimistic transfer function performance estimates. H-block cross validation, where all samples within h kilometres of the test samples are omitted is a method for obtaining unbiased transfer function performance estimates. We assess three methods for determining the optimal h using simulated data and published transfer functions. Some transfer functions perform notably worse when h-block cross validation is used.
L. Jonkers and M. Kučera
Biogeosciences, 12, 2207–2226, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-2207-2015, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-12-2207-2015, 2015
I. Hessler, S. P. Harrison, M. Kucera, C. Waelbroeck, M.-T. Chen, C. Anderson, A. de Vernal, B. Fréchette, A. Cloke-Hayes, G. Leduc, and L. Londeix
Clim. Past, 10, 2237–2252, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-2237-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-10-2237-2014, 2014
A. J. Enge, U. Witte, M. Kucera, and P. Heinz
Biogeosciences, 11, 2017–2026, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-2017-2014, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-2017-2014, 2014
M. F. G. Weinkauf, T. Moller, M. C. Koch, and M. Kučera
Biogeosciences, 10, 6639–6655, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6639-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-6639-2013, 2013
Y. Milker, R. Rachmayani, M. F. G. Weinkauf, M. Prange, M. Raitzsch, M. Schulz, and M. Kučera
Clim. Past, 9, 2231–2252, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2231-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-2231-2013, 2013
R. J. Telford, C. Li, and M. Kucera
Clim. Past, 9, 859–870, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-859-2013, https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-9-859-2013, 2013
Related subject area
Planktic foraminifera
Biochronology and evolution of Pulleniatina (planktonic foraminifera)
Globigerinoides rublobatus – a new species of Pleistocene planktonic foraminifera
Analysing planktonic foraminiferal growth in three dimensions with foram3D: an R package for automated trait measurements from CT scans
Spine-like structures in Paleogene muricate planktonic foraminifera
Taxonomic review of living planktonic foraminifera
Upper Eocene planktonic foraminifera from northern Saudi Arabia: implications for stratigraphic ranges
Jurassic planktic foraminifera from the Polish Basin
Automated analysis of foraminifera fossil records by image classification using a convolutional neural network
Middle Jurassic (Bajocian) planktonic foraminifera from the northwest Australian margin
Ontogenetic disparity in early planktic foraminifers
Seasonal and interannual variability in population dynamics of planktic foraminifers off Puerto Rico (Caribbean Sea)
Calcification depth of deep-dwelling planktonic foraminifera from the eastern North Atlantic constrained by stable oxygen isotope ratios of shells from stratified plankton tows
Factors affecting consistency and accuracy in identifying modern macroperforate planktonic foraminifera
Paul N. Pearson, Jeremy Young, David J. King, and Bridget S. Wade
J. Micropalaeontol., 42, 211–255, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-42-211-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-42-211-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Planktonic foraminifera are marine plankton that have a long and continuous fossil record. They are used for correlating and dating ocean sediments and studying evolution and past climates. This paper presents new information about Pulleniatina, one of the most widespread and abundant groups, from an important site in the Pacific Ocean. It also brings together a very large amount of information on the fossil record from other sites globally.
Marcin Latas, Paul N. Pearson, Christopher R. Poole, Alessio Fabbrini, and Bridget S. Wade
J. Micropalaeontol., 42, 57–81, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-42-57-2023, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-42-57-2023, 2023
Short summary
Short summary
Planktonic foraminifera are microscopic single-celled organisms populating world oceans. They have one of the most complete fossil records; thanks to their great abundance, they are widely used to study past marine environments. We analysed and measured series of foraminifera shells from Indo-Pacific sites, which led to the description of a new species of fossil planktonic foraminifera. Part of its population exhibits pink pigmentation, which is only the third such case among known species.
Anieke Brombacher, Alex Searle-Barnes, Wenshu Zhang, and Thomas H. G. Ezard
J. Micropalaeontol., 41, 149–164, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-41-149-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-41-149-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
Foraminifera are sand-grain-sized marine organisms that build spiral shells. When they die, the shells sink to the sea floor where they are preserved for millions of years. We wrote a software package that automatically analyses the fossil spirals to learn about evolution of new shapes in the geological past. With this software we will be able to analyse larger datasets than we currently can, which will improve our understanding of the evolution of new species.
Paul N. Pearson, Eleanor John, Bridget S. Wade, Simon D'haenens, and Caroline H. Lear
J. Micropalaeontol., 41, 107–127, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-41-107-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-41-107-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
The microscopic shells of planktonic foraminifera accumulate on the sea floor over millions of years, providing a rich archive for understanding the history of the oceans. We examined an extinct group that flourished between about 63 and 32 million years ago using scanning electron microscopy and show that they were covered with needle-like spines in life. This has implications for analytical methods that we use to determine past seawater temperature and acidity.
Geert-Jan A. Brummer and Michal Kučera
J. Micropalaeontol., 41, 29–74, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-41-29-2022, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-41-29-2022, 2022
Short summary
Short summary
To aid researchers working with living planktonic foraminifera, we provide a comprehensive review of names that we consider appropriate for extant species. We discuss the reasons for the decisions we made and provide a list of species and genus-level names as well as other names that have been used in the past but are considered inappropriate for living taxa, stating the reasons.
Bridget S. Wade, Mohammed H. Aljahdali, Yahya A. Mufrreh, Abdullah M. Memesh, Salih A. AlSoubhi, and Iyad S. Zalmout
J. Micropalaeontol., 40, 145–161, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-40-145-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-40-145-2021, 2021
Short summary
Short summary
We examined the planktonic foraminifera (calcareous zooplankton) from a section in northern Saudi Arabia. We found the assemblages to be diverse, well-preserved and of late Eocene age. Our study provides new insights into the stratigraphic ranges of many species and indicates that the late Eocene had a higher tropical/subtropical diversity of planktonic foraminifera than previously reported.
Maria Gajewska, Zofia Dubicka, and Malcolm B. Hart
J. Micropalaeontol., 40, 1–13, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-40-1-2021, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-40-1-2021, 2021
Ross Marchant, Martin Tetard, Adnya Pratiwi, Michael Adebayo, and Thibault de Garidel-Thoron
J. Micropalaeontol., 39, 183–202, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-39-183-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-39-183-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Foraminifera are marine microorganisms with a calcium carbonate shell. Their fossil remains build up on the seafloor, forming kilometres of sediment over time. From analysis of the foraminiferal record we can estimate past climate conditions and the geological history of the Earth. We have developed an artificial intelligence system for automatically identifying foraminifera species, replacing the time-consuming manual approach and thus helping to make these analyses more efficient and accurate.
Marjorie Apthorpe
J. Micropalaeontol., 39, 93–115, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-39-93-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-39-93-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Three well-preserved new species of Middle Jurassic (Bajocian) planktonic foraminifera from the continental margin of northwest Australia are described. This is on the southern shelf of the Tethys Ocean, and these planktonics are the first to be reported from the Jurassic Southern Hemisphere. Described as new are Globuligerina bathoniana australiana n. ssp., G. altissapertura n. sp. and Mermaidogerina loopae n. gen. n. sp. The research is part of a study of regional Jurassic foraminifera.
Sophie Kendall, Felix Gradstein, Christopher Jones, Oliver T. Lord, and Daniela N. Schmidt
J. Micropalaeontol., 39, 27–39, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-39-27-2020, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-39-27-2020, 2020
Short summary
Short summary
Changes in morphology during development can have profound impacts on an organism but are hard to quantify as we lack preservation in the fossil record. As they grow by adding chambers, planktic foraminifera are an ideal group to study changes in growth in development. We analyse four different species of Jurassic foraminifers using a micro-CT scanner. The low morphological variability suggests that strong constraints, described in the modern ocean, were already acting on Jurassic specimens.
Anna Jentzen, Joachim Schönfeld, Agnes K. M. Weiner, Manuel F. G. Weinkauf, Dirk Nürnberg, and Michal Kučera
J. Micropalaeontol., 38, 231–247, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-38-231-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-38-231-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
The study assessed the population dynamics of living planktic foraminifers on a weekly, seasonal, and interannual timescale off the coast of Puerto Rico to improve our understanding of short- and long-term variations. The results indicate a seasonal change of the faunal composition, and over the last decades. Lower standing stocks and lower stable carbon isotope values of foraminifers in shallow waters can be linked to the hurricane Sandy, which passed the Greater Antilles during autumn 2012.
Andreia Rebotim, Antje Helga Luise Voelker, Lukas Jonkers, Joanna J. Waniek, Michael Schulz, and Michal Kucera
J. Micropalaeontol., 38, 113–131, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-38-113-2019, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-38-113-2019, 2019
Short summary
Short summary
To reconstruct subsurface water conditions using deep-dwelling planktonic foraminifera, we must fully understand how the oxygen isotope signal incorporates into their shell. We report δ18O in four species sampled in the eastern North Atlantic with plankton tows. We assess the size and crust effect on the isotopic δ18O and compared them with predictions from two equations. We reveal different patterns of calcite addition with depth, highlighting the need to perform species-specific calibrations.
Isabel S. Fenton, Ulrike Baranowski, Flavia Boscolo-Galazzo, Hannah Cheales, Lyndsey Fox, David J. King, Christina Larkin, Marcin Latas, Diederik Liebrand, C. Giles Miller, Katrina Nilsson-Kerr, Emanuela Piga, Hazel Pugh, Serginio Remmelzwaal, Zoe A. Roseby, Yvonne M. Smith, Stephen Stukins, Ben Taylor, Adam Woodhouse, Savannah Worne, Paul N. Pearson, Christopher R. Poole, Bridget S. Wade, and Andy Purvis
J. Micropalaeontol., 37, 431–443, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-37-431-2018, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-37-431-2018, 2018
Short summary
Short summary
In this study we investigate consistency in species-level identifications and whether disagreements are predictable. Twenty-three scientists identified a set of 100 planktonic foraminifera, noting their confidence in each identification. The median accuracy of students was 57 %; 79 % for experienced researchers. Where they were confident in the identifications, the values are 75 % and 93 %, respectively. Accuracy was significantly higher if the students had been taught how to identify species.
Cited articles
Al-Sabouni, N., Kučera, M., and Schmidt, D. N.: Vertical niche
separation control of diversity and size disparity in planktonic
foraminifera, Mar. Micropaleontol., 63, 75–90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marmicro.2006.11.002, 2007.
Antonov, J., Levitus, S., Boyer, T. P., Conkright, M., O' Brien, T., and
Stephens, C.: World Ocean Atlas 2008, Volume 1: Temperature of the Atlantic
Ocean, NOAA Atlas, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 166
pp., 2008.
Austen, G. E., Bindemann, M., Griffiths, R. A., and Roberts, D. L.: Species
identification by experts and non-experts: Comparing images from field
guides, Sci. Rep.-UK, 6, 33634, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33634, 2016.
Canudo, J. I., Keller, G., and Molina, E.: Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary
extinction pattern and faunal turnover at Agost and Caravaca, S.E. Spain,
Mar. Micropaleontol., 17, 319–341, https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8398(91)90019-3, 1991.
Clarke, K. R.: Non-parametric multivariate analyses of changes in community
structure, Aust. J. Ecol., 18, 117–143,
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1993.tb00438.x, 1993.
CLIMAP: The surface of the ice-age earth, Science, 191, 1131–1137,
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.191.4232.1131, 1976.
Culverhouse, P. F., Williams, R., Reguera, B., Herry, V., and
González-Gil, S.: Do experts make mistakes? A comparison of human and
machine identification of dinoflagellates, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.,
247, 17–25, https://doi.org/10.3354/meps247017, 2003.
Fenton, I.: Dataset: Al Sabouni et al Reproducibility, Natural History Museum Data Portal, https://doi.org/10.5519/0090655,
2018.
Fenton, I. S., Pearson, P. N., Dunkley Jones, T., and Purvis, A.:
Environmental predictors of diversity in Recent planktonic foraminifera as
recorded in marine sediments, PLoS ONE, 11, e0165522, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165522, 2016.
Fenton, I. S., Baranowski, U., Boscolo-Galazzo, F., Cheales, H., Fox, L., King, D. J.,
Larkin, C., Latas, M., Liebrand, D., Miller, C. G., Nilsson-Kerr, K., Piga, E., Pugh, H.,
Remmelzwaal, S., Roseby, Z. A., Smith, Y. M., Stukins, S., Taylor, B., Woodhouse, A.,
Worne, S., Pearson, P. N., Poole, C. R., Wade, B. S., and Purvis, A.: Factors affecting
consistency and accuracy in identifying modern macroperforate planktonic
foraminifera, J. Micropalaeontol., 37, 431–443, https://doi.org/10.5194/jm-37-431-2018, 2018.
Ginsburg, R. N.: An attempt to resolve the controversy over the
end-Cretaceous extinction of planktic foraminifera at El Kef, Tunisia using
a blind test Introduction: Background and procedures, Mar. Micropaleontol., 29, 67–68, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8398(96)00038-2, 1997a.
Ginsburg, R. N.: Perspectives on the blind test, Mar. Micropaleontol.,
29, 101–103, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8398(96)00046-1,
1997b.
Hammer, Ø. and Harper, D. A. T.: Paleontological Data Analysis,
Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK, 368 pp., 2008.
Hemleben, C., Spindler, M., and Anderson, O. R.: Modern Planktonic
Foraminifera, Springer-Verlag, New York, 363 pp., 1989.
Herm, D.: Mikropaläontologisch-stratigraphische Untersuchungen im
Kreideflysch zwischen Deva und Zumaya (Prov. Guipuzcoa, Nordspanien),
Zeitschrift der Deutschen Geologischen Gesellschaft, 115, 277–342, 1963.
Hsiang, A. Y., Elder, L. E., and Hull, P. M.: Towards a morphological metric
of assemblage dynamics in the fossil record: A test case using planktonic
foraminifera, Philos. T. R. Soc. Lond. B, 371, 20150227, https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2015.0227, 2016.
Imbrie, J. and Kipp, N. G.: A new micropaleontological method for
quantitative paleoclimatology: Application to a late Pleistocene Caribbean
core, in: The Late Cenozoic Glacial Ages, edited by: Turekian, K. K., Yale
University Press, New Haven, Conneticut, 71–181, 1971.
Keller, G.: Extended Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary extinctions and delayed
population change in planktonic foraminifera from Brazos River, Texas,
Paleoceanography, 4, 287–332, https://doi.org/10.1029/PA004i003p00287, 1989.
Kellogg, T. B.: Paleoclimatic significance of subpolar foraminifera in
high-latitude marine sediments, Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 21,
189–193, https://doi.org/10.1139/e84-020, 1984.
Kelly, M. G., Bayer, M. M., Hürlimann, J., and Telford, R. J.: Human
error and quality assurance in diatom analysis, in: Automatic Diatom
Identification, Machine Perception and Artificial Intelligence, World
Scientific, Singapore, 75–91, 2002.
Kennett, J. P. and Srinivasan, M. S.: Neogene Planktonic Foraminifera: A
Phylogenetic Atlas, Hutchinson Ross Publishing Company, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, 263 pp., 1983.
Kučera, M. and Darling, K. F.: Cryptic species of planktonic
foraminifera: Their effect on palaeoceanographic reconstructions,
Philos. T. R. Soc. A, 360, 695–718, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2001.0962, 2002.
Kučera, M., Weinelt, M., Kiefer, T., Pflaumann, U., Hayes, A., Weinelt,
M., Chen, M.-T., Mix, A. C., Barrows, T. T., Cortijo, E., Duprat, J.,
Juggins, S., and Waelbroeck, C.: Reconstruction of sea-surface temperatures
from assemblages of planktonic foraminifera: Multi-technique approach based
on geographically constrained calibration data sets and its application to
glacial Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, Quaternary Sci. Rev., 24,
951–998, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2004.07.014,
2005.
Kuhn, M.: Contributions from Wing, J., Weston, S., Williams, A.,
Keefer, C., Engelhardt, A., Cooper, T., Mayer, Z.,
Kenkel, B., the R Core Team, Benesty, M., Lescarbeau, R.,
Ziem, A., Scrucca, L., Tang, Y., Candan, C., and Hunt, T.,
caret: Classification and Regression Training, R package version
6.0-80, available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=caret, last access: 21 November 2018.
Luterbacher, H.-P. and Premoli Silva, I.: Note préliminaire sur une
révision du profil de Gubbio, Italie, Rivista Italiana di Paleontologia
e Stratigrafia, 68, 253–288, 1962.
Luterbacher, H.-P. and Premoli Silva, I.: Biostratigrafia del limite
Cretaceo-Terziario nell' Appennino centrale, Rivista Italiana di
Paleontologia e Stratigrafia, 70, 67–128, 1964.
MacLeod, N., Benfield, M., and Culverhouse, P.: Time to automate
identification, Nature, 467, 154–155, https://doi.org/10.1038/467154a, 2010.
Maechler, M., Rousseeuw, P., Struyf, A., Hubert, M., and Hornik, K.:
cluster: Cluster Analysis Basics and Extensions, R package
version 2.0.7-1, 2015.
Malmgren, B. A. and Kennett, J. P.: Biometric differentiation between
recent Globigerina bulloides and Globigerina falconensis in the southern Indian Ocean, J. Foramin. Res.,
7, 130–148, 1977.
Morard, R., Quillévéré, F., Escarguel, G., de Garidel-Thoron,
T., de Vargas, C., and Kučera, M.: Ecological modeling of the
temperature dependence of cryptic species of planktonic foraminifera in the
Southern Hemisphere, Palaeogeogr. Palaeocl., 391,
13–33, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.palaeo.2013.05.011,
2013.
Niebler, H. S. and Gersonde, R.: A planktic foraminiferal transfer function
for the southern South Atlantic Ocean, Mar. Micropaleontol., 34,
213–234, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8398(98)00009-7, 1998.
Oksanen, J., Blanchet, F. G., Kindt, R., Legendre, P., Minchin, P. R.,
O'Hara, R. B., Simpson, G. L., Solymos, P., Stevens, M. H. H., and Wagner,
H.: vegan: Community ecology package, R package
version 2.5-2, available at: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan (last access: 21 November 2018), 2015.
Olsson, R. K., Hemleben, C., Berggren, W. A., and Huber, B. T.: Atlas of
Paleocene Planktonic Foraminifera, Smithsonian Contributions to
Paleobiology, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, D.C., 252 pp., 1999.
O'Neill, M. A. and Denos, M.: Automating biostratigraphy in oil and gas
exploration: Introducing GeoDAISY, J. Petrol. Sci.
Eng., 149, 851–859, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2016.11.032, 2017.
Pearson, P. N., Olsson, R. K., Huber, B. T., Hemleben, C., and Berggren, W.
A.: Atlas of Eocene Planktonic Foraminifera, Cushman Foundation for
Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication No. 41, edited by: Culver, S.
J., Cushman Foundation for Foraminiferal Research, Special Publication,
Fredericksburg, Virginia 22405 USA, 514 pp., 2006.
Ranaweera, K., Bains, S., and Joseph, D.: Analysis of image-based
classification of foraminiferal tests, Mar. Micropaleontol., 72, 60–65,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marmicro.2009.03.004, 2009a.
Ranaweera, K., Harrison, A. P., Bains, S., and Joseph, D.: Feasibility of
computer-aided identification of foraminiferal tests, Mar. Micropaleontol., 72, 66–75, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marmicro.2009.03.005, 2009b.
R Core Team: R: A language and environment for statistical computing, R
Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, 2015.
Rutherford, S., D'Hondt, S., and Prell, W.: Environmental controls on the
geographic distribution of zooplankton diversity, Nature, 400, 749–753,
https://doi.org/10.1038/23449, 1999.
Schiebel, R. and Hemleben, C.: Planktic Foraminifers in the Modern Ocean,
edited by: Schiebel, R. and Hemleben, C., Springer Berlin Heidelberg,
Berlin, Heidelberg, 2017.
Siccha, M. and Kučera, M.: ForCenS, a curated database of planktonic
foraminifera census counts in marine surface sediment samples, Scientific
Data, 4, 170109, https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2017.109,
2017.
Simpson, R., Williams, R., Ellis, R., and Culverhouse, P. F.: Biological
pattern recognition by neural networks, Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser., 79,
303–308, 1992.
Wade, B. S., Olsson, R. K., Pearson, P. N., Huber, B. T., and Berggren, W.
A.: Atlas of Oligocene Planktonic Foraminifera, Cushman Foundation Special
Publications, Fredericksburg, Virginia 22405, USA, 524 pp., 2018.
Weilhoefer, C. L., and Pan, Y.: A comparison of diatom assemblages generated
by two sampling protocols, J. N. Am. Benthol.
Soc., 26, 308–318, https://doi.org/10.1899/0887-3593(2007)26[308:ACODAG]2.0.CO;2, 2007.
Zachariasse, W. J., Riedel, W. R., Sanfilippo, A., Schmidt, R. R., Brolsma,
M. J., Schrader, H. J., Gersonde, R., Drooger, M. M., and Broekman, J. A.:
Micropaleontological counting methods and techniques: An exercise on an
eight metres section of the lower Pliocene of Capo Rossello, Sicily, Utrecht
micropaleontological bulletins, 17, 265, 1978.
Zhong, B., Ge, Q., Kanakiya, B., Marchitto, R. M. T., and Lobaton, E.: A
comparative study of image classification algorithms for Foraminifera
identification, 2017 IEEE Symposium Series on Computational Intelligence
(SSCI), 1–8, 2017.
Short summary
In this study we investigate consistency in species-level identifications and whether disagreements are predictable. Overall, 21 researchers from across the globe identified sets of 300 specimens or digital images of planktonic foraminifera. Digital identifications tended to be more disparate. Participants trained by the same person often had more similar identifications. Disagreements hardly affected transfer-function temperature estimates but produced larger differences in diversity metrics.
In this study we investigate consistency in species-level identifications and whether...
